学者观点

何新看法:西方确实伪造了希腊历史

字号+作者:何新 来源:何新博客 2011-12-13 09:58 评论(创建话题) 收藏成功收藏本文

昨天本博转发了国外洋葱讽刺网的一篇文章,揭露西方统治势力曾经指使学者伪造希腊历史,为希腊民主制度整容。 这里介绍一下一下何新对此问题的看法。老何'...

昨天本博转发了国外洋葱讽刺网的一篇文章,揭露西方统治势力曾经指使学者伪造希腊历史,为希腊民主制度整容。

这里介绍一下一下何新对此问题的看法。老何说:
这篇文章揭露的根本不够。西方近代资本主义文明的根,本来就不是希腊的宗教文化而是犹太的宗教和金钱崇拜文化。这方面可以看两个犹太学者韦伯(论证过新教的希伯来渊源)与波普(曾经大骂希腊文明)的书。中国自由主义很膜拜这两个犹太自由主义学者,但是看来对他们的书没有认真地读。


原生希腊人是黑头发黑眼睛的人种,与古埃及人接近,与北欧的黄头发蓝眼睛满身长毛的哥特——日耳曼——盎格鲁撒克逊人根本不搭界。古希腊人与罗马人都认为北欧、西欧那些白色人是没有进入文明的野蛮人——蛮族。这些希腊人眼中的蛮族,在种族上才是现代西方多数欧美人的祖宗。


老何说,希腊有很多城邦,多数不是实行城邦民主制度。雅典的城邦民主是保留氏族血缘社会时代氏族民主的残余——不是什么先进制度,中国先夏时代——尧舜禹传说时代也是这种氏族民主。“选贤与能”。
古代希腊真正的强国不是雅典是斯巴达,一个君主国 。
后来统一大希腊的是马其顿国王菲利普,他的儿子是亚历山大。

伯利克里的希腊很大程度是一个毫无实证的虚构神话。
休昔底德的伯罗奔尼撒战争史也经过文艺复兴学者和近代英国人的篡改,不是原作。

最有意思的是,希腊哲学的三大圣贤——苏格拉底、柏拉图、亚里士多德都是反对雅典的氏族民主制度的。苏格拉底因此在雅典人一人一票的投票表决下被强迫饮下毒酒而死。
柏拉图主张由一个贤明的哲学国王治国。
亚里士多德的政治名言是:多头决策不好,民主不如独裁(这个话肯定会让自由派发疯,但亚氏确实说过类似的话)。
所以:希腊代表民主(顾准的说法),民主代表先进政治制度的说法是不符合真实的希腊史的。学术界有必要摆脱西方输入的定见重新思考。

此外,认为雅典民主制度代表希腊主流文明的说法也不符合真实的历史。伪造希腊历史的人,最早是所谓文艺复兴时代的威尼斯、佛罗伦萨的城市独立共和国。这些共和国是犹太银行家——中世纪的犹太共济会控制的。当时,他们需要制造一个古代民主共和国的样板为他们的独立自治城市共和国找到历史根据。
后来,则是18世纪反对王政和教皇的英国人和20世纪冷战时代的西方学者。

老何说,我讲这些是有来自西方自己的充分史料和考古根据的。但先粗略谈谈,这并不是考证,考证以后慢慢做。


附:

网文:共济会为支持西方民主冒认和伪造希腊文明  

最近西方一些历史学家认为,由于找不到“合适"的文献和古迹来支持曾经存在一个先进的希腊文明,西方(共济会)在冷战期间指示一些学者伪造了大量的希腊文献和物品。而这样做的理由是,为了给西方的民主文明寻找一个历史上的源头。
以下是原文:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/historians-admit-to-inventing-ancient-greeks,18209/

Scholars apologize for attributing Western democracy to a make-believe civilization.
Historians Admit To Inventing Ancient GreeksOctober 7, 2010 | ISSUE 46?40 
WASHINGTON—A group of leading historians held a press conference Monday at the National Geographic Society to announce they had "entirely fabricated" ancient Greece, a culture long thought to be the intellectual basis of Western civilization.
The group acknowledged that the idea of a sophisticated, flourishing society existing in Greece more than two millennia ago was a complete fiction created by a team of some two dozen historians, anthropologists, and classicists who worked nonstop between 1971 and 1974 to forge "Greek" documents and artifacts.
"Honestly, we never meant for things to go this far," said Professor Gene Haddlebury, who has offered to resign his position as chair of Hellenic Studies at Georgetown University. "We were young and trying to advance our careers, so we just started making things up: Homer, Aristotle, Socrates, Hippocrates, the lever and fulcrum, rhetoric, ethics, all the different kinds of columns—everything."
Enlarge Image
Just one of the "ancient" artifacts dreamed up in a basement in Somerville, MA.
"Way more stuff than any one civilization could have come up with, obviously," he added.
According to Haddlebury, the idea of inventing a wholly fraudulent ancient culture came about when he and other scholars realized they had no idea what had actually happened in Europe during the 800-year period before the Christian era.
Frustrated by the gap in the record, and finding archaeologists to be "not much help at all," they took the problem to colleagues who were then scrambling to find a way to explain where things such as astronomy, cartography, and democracy had come from.
Within hours the greatest and most influential civilization of all time was born.
"One night someone made a joke about just taking all these ideas, lumping them together, and saying the Greeks had done it all 2,000 years ago," Haddlebury said. "One thing led to another, and before you know it, we’re coming up with everything from the golden ratio to the Iliad."
"That was a bitch to write, by the way," he continued, referring to the epic poem believed to have laid the foundation for the Western literary tradition. "But it seemed to catch on."
Around the same time, a curator at the Smithsonian reportedly asked for Haddlebury’s help: The museum had received a sizeable donation to create an exhibit on the ancient world but "really didn’t have a whole lot to put in there." The historians immediately set to work, hastily falsifying evidence of a civilization that— complete with its own poets and philosophers, gods and heroes—would eventually become the centerpiece of schoolbooks, college educations, and the entire field of the humanities.
Emily Nguyen-Whiteman, one of the young academics who "pulled a month’s worth of all-nighters" working on the project, explained that the whole of ancient Greek architecture was based on buildings in Washington, D.C., including a bank across the street from the coffee shop where they met to "bat around ideas about mythology or whatever."
"We picked Greece because we figured nobody would ever go there to check it out," Nguyen-Whiteman said. "Have you ever seen the place? It’s a dump. It’s like an abandoned gravel pit infested with cats."
She added, "Inevitably, though, people started looking around for some of this ’ancient’ stuff, and next thing I know I’m stuck in Athens all summer building a goddamn Parthenon just to cover our tracks."
Nguyen-Whiteman acknowledged she was also tasked with altering documents ranging from early Bibles to the writings of Thomas Jefferson to reflect a "Classical Greek" influence—a task that also included the creation, from scratch, of a language based on modern Greek that could pass as its ancient precursor.
Historians told reporters that some of the so-called Greek ideas were in fact borrowed from the Romans, stripped to their fundamentals, and then attributed to fictional Greek predecessors. But others they claimed as their own.
"Geometry? That was all Kevin," said Haddlebury, referring to former graduate student Kevin Davenport. "Man, that kid was on fire in those days. They teach Davenportian geometry in high schools now, though of course they call it Euclidean."
Sources confirmed that long hours and lack of sleep took their toll on Davenport, and after the lukewarm reception of his work on homoeroticism in Spartan military, he left the group.
In a statement expressing their "profound apologies" for misleading the world on the subject of antiquity for almost 40 years, the historians expressed hope that their work would survive on its own merits.
"It would be a shame to see humanity abandon achievements such as heliocentrism and the plays of Aeschylus just because of their origin," the statement read in part. "Moreover, we have some rather disappointing things to tell you about the pyramids, the works of Leonardo da Vinci, penicillin, the Internet, the scientific method, movies, and dogs."
为了达到某种战略目的,英美共济会一贯善于搞战略欺骗(strategic deception)! 这是英美(实际上也包括犹太人)在国际战略上更胜一筹的证明之一!

阿波罗登月其实早已经是美苏宇航局内部公开的秘密,是冷战战略欺骗的产物。苏联人肚子里明白着呢,虽然没有公开挑明,但在70年代拍了一部电影《水星五号》(讲的是美国计划登陆火星,最终被发现是个骗局)来影射美国的登月计划。
      很有意思的是苏联为什么只用这样的方式揭露,因为苏联的宇航计划中也有造假的成分被美国人抓住了辫子,于是大家一起骗着玩。阿波罗登月其实也是当年弥天大谎的一部分。因为苏联所谓登月探测器登月也是谎言。
再就有之后的911惊天骗局。可谓一脉相承。

事实上1969年要完成阿波罗式的登月壮举(在没有大气的星球载人软着陆、直播、返回),恐怕到2050年都很难现实。这与中国当年“亩产万斤”的神话是一回事!
许多人以为卫星上天了、加加林飞天了、航天器实现对接了,接下来登月也不在话下。可实际上登月的难度远远超过他们想像1000倍。
中国大多数人,虽然不再相信什么共产主义了。可由于自身素质和认知能力,又落入盲从和迷信美国以及共济会意识形态的另一个怪圈。
近代中国人的思想一直被‘绝对主义’阴影缠身。
   “登月”处于什么时代的背景? 其他不说——所谓6次“成功登月”全在尼克松总统任期内。
       而这位“伟大”的总统,自己却因水门事件的“阴谋”和撒谎而被赶下台。

     世界上没有阴谋吗?!

本网除标明“PLTYW原创”的文章外,其它文章均为转载或者爬虫(PBot)抓取; 本文只代表作者个人观点,不代表本站观点,仅供大家学习参考。本网站属非谋利性质,旨在传播马克思主义和共产主义历史文献和参考资料。凡刊登的著作文献侵犯了作者、译者或版权持有人权益的,可来信联系本站删除。 本站邮箱[email protected]

相关文章